Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick has been boasting that his state's health reform initiative has reduced the number of uninsured by half, with nearly 300,000 more people added to the health insurance rolls. What he doesn't say is that four out of five of them are relying heavily on taxpayer subsidies for their coverage. Of the 293,000 people newly insured in Massachusetts:
Further, about 60,000 are being exempt from the mandate that all citizens must buy coverage, showing how elusive the goal of universal coverage will be, even for a state that had a relatively low uninsured population to begin with. And costs are still an issue:
Further, the state is trying to figure out what to do with those businesses that already are offering coverage but whose policies don't comply with the higher standards set by the government. Should they be exempted, forced to pay for more expensive coverage, or be fined? Gov. Patrick and other governors were in town this week pleading with Congress to reverse the administration's Medicaid and SCHIP reform policies, saying they would threaten their ability to expand or even sustain coverage. That's because Massachusetts and other states rely heavily on federal payments for their expansion plans. The president wants them to focus on covering poor children and needy citizens first. Since the Bay State's initiative is being seen by many as a model for the nation, it's important to pay attention. There is clearly no Massachusetts miracle here. Other states should certainly be cautious before proceeding.

0 comments:
Post a Comment